Home Contact New York News Photos 1 2 Reviews Sports Web Finds
Your Host
Site Tools
Categories
Archive
Greatest Hits
Photos
Interviews
Search



PaulKatcher.com
All of Web
Wednesday, March 12, 2003

Review: Recent Urban Fashion
I used to get angry at the monkey-see-monkey-do fashion trends of the inner-cities. One rapper wears something and soon everyone's gotta have one. A bomber jacket. A hat with the stupid tag still on it. And sweatsuits in public!

But Tuesday took the cake. A coworker is doing a story on these fashionable throwback sports jerseys, so I looked at the price tag of a Willie Mays gray flannel No. 24. The price: $225! I had steam coming out of my ears. Folks, it does not cost anywhere near $225 to affix a few letters and two numbers to a god damn baseball jersey. The people who spend their precious disposable income on such things are just outbidding themselves in a quest to look, ironically, like everyone else.

Should we be surprised? No. Happens every time Jay-Z comes out with a new video. Presenting some of the worst urban fashion trends in recent memory.

Tommy Hilfiger — It was just as inconceivable then, as it is now, that street kids went ga-ga over a clothing line made for the preppiest people on the planet. If the cultural statement was we, too, can afford such luxury items, the irony is that most of the Hilfiger stuff bought in New York was knockoffs emanating from Canal Street.

NASCAR Jackets — OK, I swear this was a trend for a brief period. I was buying a leather jacket once, and this black couple — can I write black on the Internet? — came in to buy a NASCAR jacket adorned with more brand-name patches than one could withstand without getting dizzy. Including those of alcohol and cigarette companies who have been accused of aggressive marketing tactics in predominantly black neighborhoods! Guess the strategy worked.

Fubu — Ah, who could ride the NYC subways around the turn of the millennium without at least one glimpse of the ubiquitous No. 05? Not 5, mind you. Adding the 0 was like adding the extra tackiness to what was clearly the ugliest line of sports clothing in recent memory. I used to work with a guy — half guido, half wigger (guigger?) — who wore these things eight days a week.

Throwback Jerseys — Like a pair of khakis, no wardrobe is complete with the aforementioned $225 throwback jersey. It can go anywhere: school, work, the overcrowded club with metal detectors at the entrance. Choose your hero: Nolan Ryan, Joe Namath, Fran Tarkenton. All the white guys none of these kids cared for when they played the game.

Category: Quickie Reviews | Permalink | Post a Comment (9)


Comments: Review: Recent Urban Fashion

damn. and i really wanted a nolan ryan jersey....

i guess i sort of figured out it was a fashion statement when i started to see a ton of rappers wearing that BEEUUUTIFUL 1986 astro's division championship jersey....it is SO appealing in that ORANGE color and all.

eeek.

more like fashion "victims", i'd say.

Posted by jen at March 12, 2003 1:33 AM

I'll stick with my kate spades and my Talbots, thank you.

I mean, like, if everyone looks bad in it, why wear it? That's the part I just don't get. Like, whatever.

Posted by lucy at March 12, 2003 8:18 AM

I have to admit I love the baseball throwback jerseys, probably because they remind me of being a kid and rooting for my favorite teams and players, oblivious the salaries, drugs, contract disputes, etc. that so often make the headlines now.

Call me crazy, but I LIKE the old baseball jerseys. Back then a uniform was SUPPOSED to be loud, simple, and stick out. Now all the uniforms you see (for all sports) all have these intricate "designer" looks to them, resplendant with colors such as teal, mauve, taupe, and burgundy. What the hell is that? What's even more disturbing is a pro sports team changing styles every few years to milk its fans for a few more dollars. Am I the only one who loved the old New England Patriots logo and colors?

However, as much as I love the old looks (kudos to the NY Jets and NY Giants bringing back their old look) I would never, EVER, think of spending $225 for a goddamn jersey that I'm only going to wear to a ballgame. What's really sad is that there are people out there who make a lot less than I do who will.

Posted by TTman at March 12, 2003 5:24 PM

"Sweatsuits in public!" How refreshing to hear that someone else seem to get it. I cringe from head to toe at the slightest glimpse of a man in sweats. ugh.

As for Prada and talbots.....canal knockoffs? I'm lucky if Iv'e shopped strawberry today or gone to Targetto.

Posted by jen at March 12, 2003 5:28 PM

you know all i have to say is EBAY start your own trend or my personal favorite grarage sales... you can get old school jerseys for like 5$

Posted by nels at March 12, 2003 7:09 PM

My you all sound so racist, Funny you don't like sweats in public? Well thanks for saving my eyes from seeing your lard ass in them

Posted by Tippy at August 4, 2003 8:15 PM

Funny how the last thing you talk about is the same thing hanging behind you in your picture. Two of them to drive that fact in even deeper. Remembering I don't wear my style because of pdiddy and his copyright infringment crew, I do wear things you would find on rappers with style, however rarely. Though I don't pay $255 for it. I'm cheap. I like clearance sales and ross (sometimes ross). I even take a year to post on a subject about the "recent urban fashion". Making it seem as though a guy who has spent 4 years on a site named after himself (but he has been to coyote ugly), is important enough to spend more then the minute it took to write this. Your links and webpage were though got a laugh from it.

Posted by Ironic at March 19, 2004 7:01 AM

Regarding the last comment sent by an anonymous person, way to come a year late to the party, but you're wrong on a lot of counts.

What I talk about in terms of throwbacks — overpriced retro sports jerseys worn everywhere, including nice restaurants — is not the same as me owning a couple of new jerseys, which are a third of the price, worn only occasionally and mostly at sporting events.

I don't know what you're getting at in terms of having a site named after myself. If it got 10 hits a day, you probably wouldn't care. Because it does very well, you seem to think it reflects on my self-importance. If you're not big on being able to write opinions online, then don't do the same. OK, Ironic?

Posted by Paul Katcher at March 19, 2004 10:41 AM

Perhaps I worded it wrong, I was agreeing with most (most!) of what you said. Leave it at that so I won't word my way into confusion again.

Posted by Ironic at March 30, 2004 7:31 AM
Post a comment
















Fark.com
- [Interesting] Crips and Bloods still keeping it real ... in New Zealand. Wait, what?

- [Amusing] Police searching for teeny tiny gang of horse thieves after 28-inch pony stolen from field (pic)

- [Photoshop] Photoshop these ancient columns

- [Asinine] From the Department of Redundancy Department: Texas issues a report declaring that Texas has too many reports. Bonus: Report is 668 pages long and took 18 months to compile

- [Hero] Woman on crutches rescued from rapist by five bystanders (With scary mugshot goodness)

Yahoo! News: Most Popular
- Palin says 17-year-old daughter is pregnant (AP)

- To rebut rumors, Palin says daughter, 17, pregnant (Reuters)

- Obama Offers a Beautifully Packaged Lie (RealClearPolitics.com)

- Malaysian man gets nut stuck around penis: report (AFP)

- Study: Bypass better than stents in long term (AP)

Yahoo! News: Sports News
- Brady says he's ready to play in Patriots' opener (AP)

- Koby Clemens, 2 other players arrested (AP)

- Go Fish: Unseeded Mardy Fish into US Open quarters (AP)

- Anderson likely to to start opener for Browns (AP)

- Brewers' GM wants changes to scoring system (AP)

Web Friends
News
Sports
New York City
Sex
Internet
Guitar
Powered by Movable Type 3.31.