Home Contact New York News Photos 1 2 Reviews Sports Web Finds
Your Host
Site Tools
Categories
Archive
Greatest Hits
Photos
Interviews
Search



PaulKatcher.com
All of Web
Thursday, January 23, 2003

Head 2 Head: Super Bowl vs. Academy Awards
Here's how Head 2 Head works: I throw out a debate between two people, places or things, and you tell me which you prefer.

Today's question is, Which do you look more forward to watching, the Super Bowl or the Oscars?

Super Bowl: The annual matchup pitting the NFL's best players — some of whom have never been to jail.
Pros: Who doesn't get chills when players charge out of the tunnel when introduced in front of 130 million viewers? Not to mention the frenzied wagering on everything from the opening coin flip to the amount of gas John Madden passes. And there's the annual reincarnation of Britney Spears in a slutty Pepsi ad.
Cons: Blowouts make a four-hour telecast seem as long as a rebroadcast of "Roots." Your favorite band's cool factor drops tenfold if it plays the halftime show. Sometimes the Bills represent the AFC.

Academy Awards: Hollywood kisses its own ass for the world.
Pros: Lots and lots of boobs. Watching millionaires sweat and feign coolness when they lose. The historical packages are cool, and the remembrances of those passed are always touching. Musical performances are usually top-rate.
Cons: Not as many boobs as at the Golden Globes. Anytime someone other than Steve Martin talks. The awards for best score, editing, blah, blah, blah. And those explanations of the accounting process!

To respond, click "Post a Comment" below.

Category: Head 2 Head | Permalink | Post a Comment (13)


Comments: Head 2 Head: Super Bowl vs. Academy Awards

I guess I should start with my own. Nothing tops the Super Bowl, in my view, because it's such a cultural event in America. Even if you don't dig football — and I do — everyone can pick a team for a day, drink some brews and scream at the TV for a few hours. Or stay out till 5 a.m. celebrating the victory of the team you didn't even want to win — like I did last year.

Posted by Paul Katcher at January 23, 2003 12:43 AM

Uh, this is kind of like asking a blind man if he'd rather have a copy of Hustler or Time? You have seen NO MOVIES in 12 months that would be in any Oscar category. I don't think "Goldmember" counts.

Posted by kevin at January 23, 2003 11:09 AM

i'm going with the superbowl. the reason? the parties, of course. and the beer. yes. the beer. and john madden isn't there, right?

although, i do love watching joan and her daughter trash the fashions on E! after the oscars...that's just good clean fun.

maybe they should incorporate an "after super bowl fasion roundup" - and i wouldn't ever have to watch the oscars, again!

Posted by jen at January 23, 2003 11:29 AM

Not even a contest. The Super Bowl is a time when everyone can get together and actually set the remote on top of the TV for three hours; the world absolutely stops while the game is on. And yes, Madden will be there, which means whether you keep the volume up or turn it down and engage in your own conversation, it's going to be a fun time. In closing, what kind of commercials does the Academy Awards offer? ...

Posted by Ryan at January 23, 2003 12:28 PM

The Academy Awards is typically the second-highest-rated telecast of the year, another bankable commodity for advertisers, so you'll see high-profile commercials then, too.

The Super Bowl usually gets at low-40s rating and the Academy Awards gets a mid-to-high 20s. Clearly, its an entire industry's Super Bowl.

But Kevin is right. I saw only two movies in 2002: "Black Hawk Down" (average) and "Goldmember" (average). Still I'll watch the Academy Awards for the aforementioned cleavage shots.

Posted by Paul Katcher at January 23, 2003 1:43 PM

I'm definitely going to have to go with the Super Bowl. The commercials every 2 seconds are more entertaining then watching actors kiss each others a$$es. Plus I'd definitely rather see a slutty Britney than an anorexic so called "actress." Well, wait, was Crossroads nominated for anything?? If it was, I may just have to sit through both of them!

Posted by Livia at January 23, 2003 2:59 PM

umm let's see
Superbowl Party with jello shots men in tight pants and lots of people
Academy awards women in horrible outfits, lame movies winning once again, and no jello shots

what do you think?

Not to mention it's the freakin RAIDERS!!!! :)

Posted by gnome-girl at January 23, 2003 3:34 PM

Yo, that's one movie you saw last year. Black Hawk Down was in late 2001. It won some awards last Oscar time. What will you see this year? Charlie's Angels 2 or Bad Boys 2?

Posted by kevin at January 23, 2003 3:42 PM

Definitley the Superbowl. I would rather sit and scream at the tv about a bad call, than about a bad movie that won way too many awards.

My wife likes the Superbowl better too. She likes the commercials better.

Posted by Jacob at January 23, 2003 3:48 PM

Why compromise? Aren't they at different times of the year?

If, when hell freezes over, they ever go head-to-head, go to a Superbowl party and TIVO the Awards at home. That way you enjoy a great party, football game and sports event and when you are good and trashed, you can go home and zip through the awards for best key grip and best boy and get to some serious boobage.

Posted by JC at January 23, 2003 3:53 PM

It has got to be the Super Bowl. Let's put it this way. Does anyone talk about the commercials after the Oscars. If you have a party for the Oscars you are 99% of the time a woman. Everyone has a party for the Super Bowl it bridges both genders.

Posted by Rob at January 23, 2003 6:14 PM

Super Bowl....but don't fuck with the Bills Paul.

Posted by CEB at January 24, 2003 12:24 AM

Both are two totally different kinds of drunk.

The Super Bowl is a drink lots of beer, munch on chips and dips with burgers and hot dogs.....Then take shots everytime a "new commercial" comes on kind of drunk.

The Oscars are a chicken dish of some sort with a few different sides followed by way, way too much wine and the occasional glass of bourbon kind of drunk.

Either way, you are left with one hell of a hangover the next morning.

Being male, though, I vote Super Bowl. This year has the makings of one of the best games in Super Bowl history. For as much as I would like to see the AFC represent, f*ck the Raiders. Go Bucs.

Posted by Andy at January 24, 2003 1:07 PM
Post a comment
















Fark.com
- [Interesting] Crips and Bloods still keeping it real ... in New Zealand. Wait, what?

- [Amusing] Police searching for teeny tiny gang of horse thieves after 28-inch pony stolen from field (pic)

- [Photoshop] Photoshop these ancient columns

- [Asinine] From the Department of Redundancy Department: Texas issues a report declaring that Texas has too many reports. Bonus: Report is 668 pages long and took 18 months to compile

- [Hero] Woman on crutches rescued from rapist by five bystanders (With scary mugshot goodness)

Yahoo! News: Most Emailed
- Los Angeles in a stew over taco trucks (The Christian Science Monitor)

- Edwards gives long-awaited endorsement to Obama (AP)

- Ants swarm over Houston area, fouling electronics (AP)

- McCain's wife sells Sudan-related investments (AP)

- Swiss man soars above Alps with jet-powered wing (AP)

Yahoo! News: Sports News
- Celtics beat Cavs 96-89 to take 3-2 lead in series (AP)

- No. 1 Justine Henin retires from tennis immediately (AP)

- Sen. Specter wants independent investigation into Spygate (AP)

- Stars avoid sweep, send West finals back to Detroit (AP)

- Reds recover for 7-6 win over Marlins in 10 innings (AP)

Web Friends
News
Sports
New York City
Sex
Internet
Guitar
Powered by Movable Type 3.31.